Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - * The U.S. is saying to Israel and the Palestinians, it is up to you to negotiate on borders and refugees, but if anyone asks us, we will probably back Israel on not returning completely to the 1967 lines and on not settling Palestinians in Israel. * Sharon's disengagement plan has been a package deal: Israel unilaterally withdraws from some areas that it does not expect to retain in any final-status agreement, while consolidating control over other areas that it must retain under any conceivable peace accord. * The international community should understand that there is no free lunch, even when it comes to unilateral concessions. If Israel is to make a very real, wrenching, and painful down-payment on a final-status arrangement, it needs a parallel diplomatic down-payment now, setting lines it will not be pressed to cross when final-status talks come. * If Israel cannot show a tangible diplomatic reward for disengagement, then disengagement can only be perceived as a reward for four years of terrorist attacks. Is it in the American interest, let alone Israel's, to fuel such a perception, much less such a reality? 2005-03-28 00:00:00Full Article
Settlement Blocs Part of a Package Deal
(Jerusalem Post) Editorial - * The U.S. is saying to Israel and the Palestinians, it is up to you to negotiate on borders and refugees, but if anyone asks us, we will probably back Israel on not returning completely to the 1967 lines and on not settling Palestinians in Israel. * Sharon's disengagement plan has been a package deal: Israel unilaterally withdraws from some areas that it does not expect to retain in any final-status agreement, while consolidating control over other areas that it must retain under any conceivable peace accord. * The international community should understand that there is no free lunch, even when it comes to unilateral concessions. If Israel is to make a very real, wrenching, and painful down-payment on a final-status arrangement, it needs a parallel diplomatic down-payment now, setting lines it will not be pressed to cross when final-status talks come. * If Israel cannot show a tangible diplomatic reward for disengagement, then disengagement can only be perceived as a reward for four years of terrorist attacks. Is it in the American interest, let alone Israel's, to fuel such a perception, much less such a reality? 2005-03-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|