Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Caroline Glick - In "How We Would Fight China," in the June issue of The Atlantic Monthly, military correspondent Robert D. Kaplan analyzes the encroaching specter of a cold war between the U.S. and China. Kaplan quotes a U.S. Marine general in the Pacific Command who explains that the nascent U.S. strategy for dealing with China will be based on multilateral military cooperation. The U.S. is quietly building deep military alliances with countries such as Singapore, India, Australia, Japan, and Thailand, which will all play key roles in containing China. Kaplan also notes the technological gap between the U.S. military and these crucial allies in the Pacific. This week it was reported that following Israel's misguided sale of Harpy aerial drones to China, Washington is now demanding control over Israel's weapons exports to India and Singapore. Yet what Israel's cultivation of its own bilateral strategic ties with countries like Singapore and India shows is that when Israel is behaving in a strategically responsible way, it is also advancing America's strategic interests. Israel was wrong to sell weapons systems to China. But the damage done to U.S. national security interests has been effectively brought under control. The damage that the U.S.'s increasingly hostile position toward Israel is doing to U.S. national security interests will not be so easily contained. Why would Singapore or India or any other U.S. ally trust an America that would abandon Israel? And how will the U.S. be more secure if it increases its dependence on Arab regimes that are inherently hostile to it and everything it stands for? 2005-06-17 00:00:00Full Article
America's Irreplaceable Ally
(Jerusalem Post) Caroline Glick - In "How We Would Fight China," in the June issue of The Atlantic Monthly, military correspondent Robert D. Kaplan analyzes the encroaching specter of a cold war between the U.S. and China. Kaplan quotes a U.S. Marine general in the Pacific Command who explains that the nascent U.S. strategy for dealing with China will be based on multilateral military cooperation. The U.S. is quietly building deep military alliances with countries such as Singapore, India, Australia, Japan, and Thailand, which will all play key roles in containing China. Kaplan also notes the technological gap between the U.S. military and these crucial allies in the Pacific. This week it was reported that following Israel's misguided sale of Harpy aerial drones to China, Washington is now demanding control over Israel's weapons exports to India and Singapore. Yet what Israel's cultivation of its own bilateral strategic ties with countries like Singapore and India shows is that when Israel is behaving in a strategically responsible way, it is also advancing America's strategic interests. Israel was wrong to sell weapons systems to China. But the damage done to U.S. national security interests has been effectively brought under control. The damage that the U.S.'s increasingly hostile position toward Israel is doing to U.S. national security interests will not be so easily contained. Why would Singapore or India or any other U.S. ally trust an America that would abandon Israel? And how will the U.S. be more secure if it increases its dependence on Arab regimes that are inherently hostile to it and everything it stands for? 2005-06-17 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|