Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Editorial - Palestinian Prime Minister Salaam Fayad said on Monday that he would be seeking a $5.6 billion, three-year aid package at a donors conference next week. Between the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993 and 2002, the Palestinians received over $4 billion in aid, according to the World Bank. This amounted to $214 per capita, which is more aid than any other people in the world received. After the Oslo Accords dissolved into a terror war, the Palestinians actually received more assistance, and even more since Hamas' rise to power. Clearly, as Quartet envoy Tony Blair himself recognizes, any new money earmarked for the Palestinians must be tightly linked to crackdowns on corruption, to establishing the rule of law, to dismantling armed gangs and to economic cooperation with surrounding countries, including Israel. But even this is not enough. The PA that Abbas controls is still teaching, believe it or not, that the "Palestine"-to-be will be in Israel's place, not Israel's peaceful neighbor. On Nov. 28, the day after the Annapolis conference, official PA television broadcast a map of all of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza covered with a Palestinian flag. A month earlier, PA television repeatedly broadcast a song that described Palestine as including Jerusalem, Acre, Haifa, Beersheba, Ramle, the Galilee, and Tiberias [- all parts of today's Israel]. Abbas may not control Gaza, or even much of Fatah, but he does control his own official media. There is no point to throwing more money at him if he does not take minimal steps to show that these funds will not be put toward a state dedicated to Israel's destruction. Ending the incitement against Israel in the PA-controlled media would mark a vital step toward creating an atmosphere in which Abbas could begin to impress upon his own people the legitimate sovereign rights of the Jewish state and the consequent need to compromise with it. 2007-12-13 01:00:00Full Article
What Abbas Can Do
[Jerusalem Post] Editorial - Palestinian Prime Minister Salaam Fayad said on Monday that he would be seeking a $5.6 billion, three-year aid package at a donors conference next week. Between the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993 and 2002, the Palestinians received over $4 billion in aid, according to the World Bank. This amounted to $214 per capita, which is more aid than any other people in the world received. After the Oslo Accords dissolved into a terror war, the Palestinians actually received more assistance, and even more since Hamas' rise to power. Clearly, as Quartet envoy Tony Blair himself recognizes, any new money earmarked for the Palestinians must be tightly linked to crackdowns on corruption, to establishing the rule of law, to dismantling armed gangs and to economic cooperation with surrounding countries, including Israel. But even this is not enough. The PA that Abbas controls is still teaching, believe it or not, that the "Palestine"-to-be will be in Israel's place, not Israel's peaceful neighbor. On Nov. 28, the day after the Annapolis conference, official PA television broadcast a map of all of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza covered with a Palestinian flag. A month earlier, PA television repeatedly broadcast a song that described Palestine as including Jerusalem, Acre, Haifa, Beersheba, Ramle, the Galilee, and Tiberias [- all parts of today's Israel]. Abbas may not control Gaza, or even much of Fatah, but he does control his own official media. There is no point to throwing more money at him if he does not take minimal steps to show that these funds will not be put toward a state dedicated to Israel's destruction. Ending the incitement against Israel in the PA-controlled media would mark a vital step toward creating an atmosphere in which Abbas could begin to impress upon his own people the legitimate sovereign rights of the Jewish state and the consequent need to compromise with it. 2007-12-13 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|