Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Ziad J. Asali - A potentially dangerous confrontation looms in September over the question of Palestinian statehood, one that threatens significant negative consequences for all parties. It is in the interests of all constructive actors to find a compromise that avoids such a confrontation. As Palestinians started pursuing this policy, several crucial facts become clear: First, the U.S. indicated unequivocally that it would veto in the Security Council a Palestinian application for UN membership, making such membership impossible at this time. Moreover, Congress has sent a strong message that UN action on Palestinian statehood would result in a cutoff of U.S. aid, and the U.S. is the single biggest donor to the PA. Second, Palestinian hopes for securing support for UN membership from a unified European community have been dashed by the open opposition of Germany and the Netherlands, and by a lack of support from nations such as Britain and France, which hold key swing votes. The significant gains that Palestinians have made recently in building institutions and preparing for their state must not be put at risk. Countries that support a potential Palestinian confrontation with the U.S. at the UN should be ready to shield Palestinians from its financial, political and security consequences. If not, they should help them find a workable compromise. The writer is founder and president of the American Task Force on Palestine. 2011-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Palestinians Face a Dangerous UN Clash on Statehood
(Washington Post) Ziad J. Asali - A potentially dangerous confrontation looms in September over the question of Palestinian statehood, one that threatens significant negative consequences for all parties. It is in the interests of all constructive actors to find a compromise that avoids such a confrontation. As Palestinians started pursuing this policy, several crucial facts become clear: First, the U.S. indicated unequivocally that it would veto in the Security Council a Palestinian application for UN membership, making such membership impossible at this time. Moreover, Congress has sent a strong message that UN action on Palestinian statehood would result in a cutoff of U.S. aid, and the U.S. is the single biggest donor to the PA. Second, Palestinian hopes for securing support for UN membership from a unified European community have been dashed by the open opposition of Germany and the Netherlands, and by a lack of support from nations such as Britain and France, which hold key swing votes. The significant gains that Palestinians have made recently in building institutions and preparing for their state must not be put at risk. Countries that support a potential Palestinian confrontation with the U.S. at the UN should be ready to shield Palestinians from its financial, political and security consequences. If not, they should help them find a workable compromise. The writer is founder and president of the American Task Force on Palestine. 2011-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|