Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(CNN) Elliot Abrams - This week Israel announced a plan to construct 277 more housing units in Ariel, a West Bank town of 18,000. The new units are to be constructed in the center of the town, so Ariel will expand in population but not in land area. It is not, in the usual Palestinian Authority parlance, "taking more Palestinian land." When I worked on these issues in the Bush Administration, we discussed settlement expansion thoroughly with the government of Israel and reached agreement on some principles. These were that Israel would create no new settlements and that existing settlements would expand in population but not in land area. New construction would be in already-built-up areas, and the phrase we used was "build up and in, not out." That way whatever the chances of a peace deal were, construction in the settlements would not reduce them. This agreement the Obama Administration ignored or denounced, suggesting at various times that it never existed, and that all construction must be frozen - even in Israel's capital, Jerusalem. (To be more accurate, construction by Israeli Jews was to be frozen; construction by Palestinians could continue.) The announcement that new units were to be built in Ariel evoked a new denunciation from Washington. The Administration still does not understand the difference between expanding a settlement physically and expanding the population of a settlement by building in already-built-up areas. Why not? In the real world those new units in Ariel do not make a final peace agreement harder. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. 2011-08-18 00:00:00Full Article
Will Ariel Block Peace?
(CNN) Elliot Abrams - This week Israel announced a plan to construct 277 more housing units in Ariel, a West Bank town of 18,000. The new units are to be constructed in the center of the town, so Ariel will expand in population but not in land area. It is not, in the usual Palestinian Authority parlance, "taking more Palestinian land." When I worked on these issues in the Bush Administration, we discussed settlement expansion thoroughly with the government of Israel and reached agreement on some principles. These were that Israel would create no new settlements and that existing settlements would expand in population but not in land area. New construction would be in already-built-up areas, and the phrase we used was "build up and in, not out." That way whatever the chances of a peace deal were, construction in the settlements would not reduce them. This agreement the Obama Administration ignored or denounced, suggesting at various times that it never existed, and that all construction must be frozen - even in Israel's capital, Jerusalem. (To be more accurate, construction by Israeli Jews was to be frozen; construction by Palestinians could continue.) The announcement that new units were to be built in Ariel evoked a new denunciation from Washington. The Administration still does not understand the difference between expanding a settlement physically and expanding the population of a settlement by building in already-built-up areas. Why not? In the real world those new units in Ariel do not make a final peace agreement harder. The writer is a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. 2011-08-18 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|