Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Amnon Rubinstein and Yaniv Roznai - While the prohibition against using civilians as human shields is widely acknowledged under international humanitarian law, the current law and its application have become incompatible with modern warfare and lead to undesirable results. In recent conflicts, including in Gaza in 2009, the strongest criticism has been directed at the counter-attacking party, usually an army of a democratic state, rather than the parties that utilized civilians in order to shield themselves, usually forces of a non-democratic state or irregular organizations such as al-Qaeda or Hamas. The counterattackers are vilified; the shielders are ignored or even exonerated. The current application of the law encourages the belligerent to use human shields against military counter-attacks. This leads directly to unfortunate results, since the flagrant use of human shields can effectively prevent an attack on a legitimate enemy target. Amnon Rubinstein is a professor of law at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, and a former Minister of Education. Yaniv Roznai is a PhD candidate at the London School of Economics.2011-08-19 00:00:00Full Article
Human Shields: Back to Reality
(Jerusalem Post) Amnon Rubinstein and Yaniv Roznai - While the prohibition against using civilians as human shields is widely acknowledged under international humanitarian law, the current law and its application have become incompatible with modern warfare and lead to undesirable results. In recent conflicts, including in Gaza in 2009, the strongest criticism has been directed at the counter-attacking party, usually an army of a democratic state, rather than the parties that utilized civilians in order to shield themselves, usually forces of a non-democratic state or irregular organizations such as al-Qaeda or Hamas. The counterattackers are vilified; the shielders are ignored or even exonerated. The current application of the law encourages the belligerent to use human shields against military counter-attacks. This leads directly to unfortunate results, since the flagrant use of human shields can effectively prevent an attack on a legitimate enemy target. Amnon Rubinstein is a professor of law at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, and a former Minister of Education. Yaniv Roznai is a PhD candidate at the London School of Economics.2011-08-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|