Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Toronto Globe and Mail) Editorial - Whatever the rights or wrongs of Israel's new security barrier, the International Court of Justice at The Hague is not the proper forum to examine the issue - and not merely because the odds are stacked against Israel from the outset. Thirty countries, including Canada, the U.S., Russia, and the members of the EU, all rightly agree with Israel's position that this is a political issue that needs to be addressed through political means. They are staying clear of the proceedings. It is well recognized in international law that countries have a right to protect their borders. And it is understandable that Israel would want to create as large an impediment as possible to the suicide bombers who have often roamed freely into Israel. 2004-02-20 00:00:00Full Article
The Israeli Barrier Doesn't Belong in Court
(Toronto Globe and Mail) Editorial - Whatever the rights or wrongs of Israel's new security barrier, the International Court of Justice at The Hague is not the proper forum to examine the issue - and not merely because the odds are stacked against Israel from the outset. Thirty countries, including Canada, the U.S., Russia, and the members of the EU, all rightly agree with Israel's position that this is a political issue that needs to be addressed through political means. They are staying clear of the proceedings. It is well recognized in international law that countries have a right to protect their borders. And it is understandable that Israel would want to create as large an impediment as possible to the suicide bombers who have often roamed freely into Israel. 2004-02-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|