Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Natan Sharansky - This week the European Commission hosted a conference on fighting the new wave of anti-Semitism that has engulfed Europe over the last few years. My experience has convinced me that moral clarity is critical in taking a stand against evil. Evil thrives when moral lines are blurred, when right and wrong is a matter of opinion rather than objective truth. Since the new anti-Semitism can hide behind the veneer of legitimate criticism of Israel, it is much more difficult to expose. What emerged from this conference was an admission by European leaders themselves that not all criticism of Israel is legitimate. If not all criticism is valid, how then do we define the boundary line? I propose the following test for differentiating legitimate criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism. The 3D test applies the same criteria that for centuries identified the different dimensions of classical anti-Semitism. Demonization: Jews were demonized for centuries as the embodiment of evil. Therefore, today we must be wary of whether the Jewish state is being demonized by having its actions blown out of all sensible proportion. Comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to Auschwitz - comparisons heard practically every day within the "enlightened" quarters of Europe - can only be considered anti-Semitic. Double standards: For thousands of years a clear sign of anti-Semitism was treating Jews differently than other peoples - the tendency to judge their behavior by a different yardstick. It is anti-Semitism when Israel is singled out by the UN for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria are ignored. Delegitimation: In the past, anti-Semites tried to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish religion, the Jewish people, or both. Today, they are trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state. While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland. If we check whether Israel is being demonized or delegitimized, or whether a double standard is being applied to it, we will always be able to see anti-Semitism clearly. The writer is Israel's Minister of Diaspora Affairs and Jerusalem. 2004-02-25 00:00:00Full Article
Seeing Anti-Semitism in 3D
(Jerusalem Post) Natan Sharansky - This week the European Commission hosted a conference on fighting the new wave of anti-Semitism that has engulfed Europe over the last few years. My experience has convinced me that moral clarity is critical in taking a stand against evil. Evil thrives when moral lines are blurred, when right and wrong is a matter of opinion rather than objective truth. Since the new anti-Semitism can hide behind the veneer of legitimate criticism of Israel, it is much more difficult to expose. What emerged from this conference was an admission by European leaders themselves that not all criticism of Israel is legitimate. If not all criticism is valid, how then do we define the boundary line? I propose the following test for differentiating legitimate criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism. The 3D test applies the same criteria that for centuries identified the different dimensions of classical anti-Semitism. Demonization: Jews were demonized for centuries as the embodiment of evil. Therefore, today we must be wary of whether the Jewish state is being demonized by having its actions blown out of all sensible proportion. Comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to Auschwitz - comparisons heard practically every day within the "enlightened" quarters of Europe - can only be considered anti-Semitic. Double standards: For thousands of years a clear sign of anti-Semitism was treating Jews differently than other peoples - the tendency to judge their behavior by a different yardstick. It is anti-Semitism when Israel is singled out by the UN for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria are ignored. Delegitimation: In the past, anti-Semites tried to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish religion, the Jewish people, or both. Today, they are trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state. While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland. If we check whether Israel is being demonized or delegitimized, or whether a double standard is being applied to it, we will always be able to see anti-Semitism clearly. The writer is Israel's Minister of Diaspora Affairs and Jerusalem. 2004-02-25 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|