Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Newsday) Barry Rubin - International law is premised on the existence of authorities willing to enforce it. What does a country do if its neighbor not only refuses to stop or arrest terrorists attacking it on a daily basis but actually encourages and supports them? There is no alternative to direct action against such a safe haven. Equally, international diplomacy generally assumes that any dispute is ultimately resolvable through compromise and negotiation. Indeed, what does a country do when the other side openly expresses an intention to destroy it and implements that policy? Another international assumption is that by targeting terrorist leaders, Israel provokes new attacks. But no such encouragement is needed. The attacks will continue anyway, and they are more effective when directed by a leadership that enjoys immunity from punishment. Finally, it should not be forgotten that Israel spent seven years trying to make a peaceful compromise through negotiated agreement. The result is the Palestinian Authority - a safe haven that incites, finances, organizes, and permits terrorist attacks against Israel. 2004-03-29 00:00:00Full Article
What Does a Country Do If Its Neighbors Won't Stop Terrorists?
(Newsday) Barry Rubin - International law is premised on the existence of authorities willing to enforce it. What does a country do if its neighbor not only refuses to stop or arrest terrorists attacking it on a daily basis but actually encourages and supports them? There is no alternative to direct action against such a safe haven. Equally, international diplomacy generally assumes that any dispute is ultimately resolvable through compromise and negotiation. Indeed, what does a country do when the other side openly expresses an intention to destroy it and implements that policy? Another international assumption is that by targeting terrorist leaders, Israel provokes new attacks. But no such encouragement is needed. The attacks will continue anyway, and they are more effective when directed by a leadership that enjoys immunity from punishment. Finally, it should not be forgotten that Israel spent seven years trying to make a peaceful compromise through negotiated agreement. The result is the Palestinian Authority - a safe haven that incites, finances, organizes, and permits terrorist attacks against Israel. 2004-03-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|