Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(London Times/BICOM) Editorial - The reaction to George W. Bush's meeting with Ariel Sharon in Washington has overwhelmed its substance. The Palestinian leadership, supplemented by a wider chorus of the EU, the UN, and the Arab world, has chosen to present what is largely a public recognition of political realities as a radical revision of American foreign policy. The idea that the peace process in the Middle East is now dead is ridiculous. In truth, an overdue opportunity for hard and serious bargaining might finally be opened. Mr. Bush's supposed "concessions" on the principle of Israel's retaining settlements on the West Bank and overt rejection of the sweeping "right of return" for Palestinians to where they might have been located in 1948 are hardly as dramatic as painted. It has long been obvious to those involved in the diplomacy of the Middle East that it was implausible to expect Israel to abandon every outpost in the West Bank or to welcome perhaps three million Palestinian exiles within its borders. 2004-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
Rhetoric and Reality
(London Times/BICOM) Editorial - The reaction to George W. Bush's meeting with Ariel Sharon in Washington has overwhelmed its substance. The Palestinian leadership, supplemented by a wider chorus of the EU, the UN, and the Arab world, has chosen to present what is largely a public recognition of political realities as a radical revision of American foreign policy. The idea that the peace process in the Middle East is now dead is ridiculous. In truth, an overdue opportunity for hard and serious bargaining might finally be opened. Mr. Bush's supposed "concessions" on the principle of Israel's retaining settlements on the West Bank and overt rejection of the sweeping "right of return" for Palestinians to where they might have been located in 1948 are hardly as dramatic as painted. It has long been obvious to those involved in the diplomacy of the Middle East that it was implausible to expect Israel to abandon every outpost in the West Bank or to welcome perhaps three million Palestinian exiles within its borders. 2004-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|