Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Maarivenglish.com) Amnon Dankner - Even supporters of the disengagement plan, like myself, should not have the hubris to accept it with complete confidence. We need look no further than Oslo to see the results of false pride, when one side believes it and it alone has a monopoly on wisdom and prescience. We must remember that the immediate, practical meaning of the disengagement is uprooting the residents of Gush Katif, the northern Gaza Strip, and northern Samaria from their homes. Any approach that belittles these people, their lives and their fate, or sees them as deserving of their fate, is totally unacceptable. The fact that many Israelis are going to pay a heavy price, including being uprooted from their homes and communities, is something to be approached with tears and lamentations. If everyone who thinks it preferable to support Sharon would show empathy for the people who will pay the price and recognize them as brothers, we would have a better chance of getting through this stage with a minimum of internal strife. 2004-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
With Tears and Lamentation
(Maarivenglish.com) Amnon Dankner - Even supporters of the disengagement plan, like myself, should not have the hubris to accept it with complete confidence. We need look no further than Oslo to see the results of false pride, when one side believes it and it alone has a monopoly on wisdom and prescience. We must remember that the immediate, practical meaning of the disengagement is uprooting the residents of Gush Katif, the northern Gaza Strip, and northern Samaria from their homes. Any approach that belittles these people, their lives and their fate, or sees them as deserving of their fate, is totally unacceptable. The fact that many Israelis are going to pay a heavy price, including being uprooted from their homes and communities, is something to be approached with tears and lamentations. If everyone who thinks it preferable to support Sharon would show empathy for the people who will pay the price and recognize them as brothers, we would have a better chance of getting through this stage with a minimum of internal strife. 2004-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|