Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Daily Beast) Eli Lake - The White House has reassured the Israelis that the administration had its own "red lines" that would trigger military action against Iran, and that there is no need for Jerusalem to act unilaterally. Israel has not agreed to ask the U.S. for permission or give significant advance warning of any pending strike. The sensitive work of trying to get both allies on the same page intensified this month with new conversations between the U.S. and Israel over what the triggers - called "red lines" in diplomatic parlance - would be to justify a pre-emptive attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Matthew Kroenig, who served as special adviser on Iran to the Office of the Secretary of Defense between July 2010 and July 2011, offered some of the possible "red lines" for a military strike in a recent Foreign Affairs article. He argued that the U.S should attack Iran's facilities if Iran expels international nuclear weapons inspectors, begins enriching its stockpiles of uranium to weapons-grade levels of 90 percent, or installs advanced centrifuges at its main uranium-enrichment facility in Qom. Earlier this month, Israeli diplomats, military officers and intelligence officials were in Washington for an annual meeting called the strategic dialogue. At the meeting, the Israeli side offered a new presentation on Iran's nuclear program, suggesting that Iran's efforts to build secret reactors for producing nuclear fuel were further along than the U.S. has publicly said. Some of the intelligence was based on soil samples collected near the suspected sites. 2011-12-28 00:00:00Full Article
U.S., Israel Discuss "Red Lines" for Iran
(Daily Beast) Eli Lake - The White House has reassured the Israelis that the administration had its own "red lines" that would trigger military action against Iran, and that there is no need for Jerusalem to act unilaterally. Israel has not agreed to ask the U.S. for permission or give significant advance warning of any pending strike. The sensitive work of trying to get both allies on the same page intensified this month with new conversations between the U.S. and Israel over what the triggers - called "red lines" in diplomatic parlance - would be to justify a pre-emptive attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Matthew Kroenig, who served as special adviser on Iran to the Office of the Secretary of Defense between July 2010 and July 2011, offered some of the possible "red lines" for a military strike in a recent Foreign Affairs article. He argued that the U.S should attack Iran's facilities if Iran expels international nuclear weapons inspectors, begins enriching its stockpiles of uranium to weapons-grade levels of 90 percent, or installs advanced centrifuges at its main uranium-enrichment facility in Qom. Earlier this month, Israeli diplomats, military officers and intelligence officials were in Washington for an annual meeting called the strategic dialogue. At the meeting, the Israeli side offered a new presentation on Iran's nuclear program, suggesting that Iran's efforts to build secret reactors for producing nuclear fuel were further along than the U.S. has publicly said. Some of the intelligence was based on soil samples collected near the suspected sites. 2011-12-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|