Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Emily B. Landau - There have been a number of indications of late that the U.S. is adopting a new and considerably more determined approach to Iran's nuclear program. These include stepped-up pressure on Iran through sanctions without waiting for Russia and China to "come on board," as well as a series of covert actions that are specifically targeting different elements of Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. is suspected of either leading this effort or cooperating with others in executing it. The change is most likely attributable to the more clear cut assessments of Iran's nuclear progress, especially as contained in the November 2011 IAEA report. In addition, the plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador on U.S. soil was not taken lightly by the administration. Without clear indication of a changed Iranian approach, a new round of negotiations at this time would not only be an exercise in futility, but could very well undercut the new level of determination that the U.S. has begun to exhibit. 2012-01-11 00:00:00Full Article
A Toughened U.S. Stance toward Iran
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Emily B. Landau - There have been a number of indications of late that the U.S. is adopting a new and considerably more determined approach to Iran's nuclear program. These include stepped-up pressure on Iran through sanctions without waiting for Russia and China to "come on board," as well as a series of covert actions that are specifically targeting different elements of Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. is suspected of either leading this effort or cooperating with others in executing it. The change is most likely attributable to the more clear cut assessments of Iran's nuclear progress, especially as contained in the November 2011 IAEA report. In addition, the plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador on U.S. soil was not taken lightly by the administration. Without clear indication of a changed Iranian approach, a new round of negotiations at this time would not only be an exercise in futility, but could very well undercut the new level of determination that the U.S. has begun to exhibit. 2012-01-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|