Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Aluf Benn - After the two fatal bombings in Gaza, one possible conclusion is that if you want to disengage, go all the way, like in Lebanon, with no security zone. But it is equally possible to draw the opposite conclusion: that the bombings show the dangers of disengagement. That as long as the violence continues, Israel must be in Gaza. On one hand, if we are losing, we should get out quickly. But on the other, withdrawal under fire clearly rewards terrorism and will lead to further escalation. Remaining on the Philadelphia Route is fatal. But leaving could be much worse, if it allows the Palestinians to smuggle long-range katyusha rockets into Gaza.2004-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
The Problematic Timetable for Disengagement
(Ha'aretz) Aluf Benn - After the two fatal bombings in Gaza, one possible conclusion is that if you want to disengage, go all the way, like in Lebanon, with no security zone. But it is equally possible to draw the opposite conclusion: that the bombings show the dangers of disengagement. That as long as the violence continues, Israel must be in Gaza. On one hand, if we are losing, we should get out quickly. But on the other, withdrawal under fire clearly rewards terrorism and will lead to further escalation. Remaining on the Philadelphia Route is fatal. But leaving could be much worse, if it allows the Palestinians to smuggle long-range katyusha rockets into Gaza.2004-05-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|