Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Sydney Morning Herald-Australia) Ruth Pollard - Despite renouncing violence decades ago after its early forays into assassination and bombing campaigns, the Muslim Brotherhood's importance as a ''springboard'' towards more radical Islamic movements for individuals such as al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is well known. Six months ago, the Brotherhood formed the Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt. According to Nathan Brown, professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University and a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, on the key question of Israel, there is a perceptible difference between the way the Muslim Brotherhood deals with the Camp David accords and Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel, and the way the Freedom and Justice Party tackles the issue. The party - faced with the enormity of the problems confronting Egypt - would rather talk of anything else but that treaty, Brown says. Yet the movement's chief spokesman, Dr. Mahmoud Ghozlan, says, "We think this treaty is imposed on us by outside our country. And we think it is an unjust treaty. Because it removes our sovereignty in Sinai...we cannot built an airport there, we cannot send our troops inside the Sinai to protect our borders.'' "We think that the Israelis do not respect [the treaty] because they have [undertaken] many attacks against our soldiers, without any justification. We have to review it again, if the people want that, via the parliament." Martin Indyk, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel and vice-president of the Brookings Institution, wrote this week after a visit to Cairo, the Muslim Brotherhood ''understand they have to make a choice between feeding the people and fighting Israel, and for the time being they have made a conscious choice of bread over bombs." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012-01-31 00:00:00Full Article
Muslim Brotherhood Stepping Out of the Shadows
(Sydney Morning Herald-Australia) Ruth Pollard - Despite renouncing violence decades ago after its early forays into assassination and bombing campaigns, the Muslim Brotherhood's importance as a ''springboard'' towards more radical Islamic movements for individuals such as al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is well known. Six months ago, the Brotherhood formed the Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt. According to Nathan Brown, professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University and a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, on the key question of Israel, there is a perceptible difference between the way the Muslim Brotherhood deals with the Camp David accords and Egypt's 1979 peace treaty with Israel, and the way the Freedom and Justice Party tackles the issue. The party - faced with the enormity of the problems confronting Egypt - would rather talk of anything else but that treaty, Brown says. Yet the movement's chief spokesman, Dr. Mahmoud Ghozlan, says, "We think this treaty is imposed on us by outside our country. And we think it is an unjust treaty. Because it removes our sovereignty in Sinai...we cannot built an airport there, we cannot send our troops inside the Sinai to protect our borders.'' "We think that the Israelis do not respect [the treaty] because they have [undertaken] many attacks against our soldiers, without any justification. We have to review it again, if the people want that, via the parliament." Martin Indyk, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel and vice-president of the Brookings Institution, wrote this week after a visit to Cairo, the Muslim Brotherhood ''understand they have to make a choice between feeding the people and fighting Israel, and for the time being they have made a conscious choice of bread over bombs." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2012-01-31 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|