Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Editorial - A Feb. 14 letter from Iranian chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili says that "talks for cooperation...on Iran's nuclear issue could be commenced," in contrast to its previous position when Iran refused even to discuss its nuclear program. The immediate question is whether Iran is using diplomacy - as it has several times before - as a way of buying time, even as it presses ahead with steps toward a bomb. A test of Iran's seriousness was underway this week as a delegation from the International Atomic Energy Agency visited the country. Yet on Tuesday, the IAEA reported another Iranian failure to cooperate. In fact, it appears likely that Tehran perceives talks as an opportunity to undermine sanctions. A bipartisan group of a dozen senators dispatched a letter to President Obama last Friday opposing "any proposal that caps or limits sanctions" in exchange for "anything less than full, verifiable and sustained suspension of all enrichment activities." If Iran is serious about a deal, it will meet the senators' terms. 2012-02-22 00:00:00Full Article
The Test of Talking to Iran
(Washington Post) Editorial - A Feb. 14 letter from Iranian chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili says that "talks for cooperation...on Iran's nuclear issue could be commenced," in contrast to its previous position when Iran refused even to discuss its nuclear program. The immediate question is whether Iran is using diplomacy - as it has several times before - as a way of buying time, even as it presses ahead with steps toward a bomb. A test of Iran's seriousness was underway this week as a delegation from the International Atomic Energy Agency visited the country. Yet on Tuesday, the IAEA reported another Iranian failure to cooperate. In fact, it appears likely that Tehran perceives talks as an opportunity to undermine sanctions. A bipartisan group of a dozen senators dispatched a letter to President Obama last Friday opposing "any proposal that caps or limits sanctions" in exchange for "anything less than full, verifiable and sustained suspension of all enrichment activities." If Iran is serious about a deal, it will meet the senators' terms. 2012-02-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|