Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Journal) James Kitfield - Israel believes that Iran is approaching a "zone of immunity" in the coming months as it buries nuclear infrastructure, and the Israelis don't trust the U.S. to launch its own military strikes if Iran crosses predetermined red lines on the way to a nuclear weapon. As if an American president can promise preventive war to assuage an ally. Martin Indyk, director of the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel, said: "The Iranians keep moving closer to the nuclear-weapons threshold; Israel gets increasingly nervous and threatens military strikes; the United States tightens sanctions in part to try and calm the Israelis; and an Iranian regime that already feels threatened reacts with greater defiance." Having begun by passively insisting that a nuke was "unacceptable" and that "no options were off the table," the administration is now on record saying that Iran's ambitions would provoke action. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently told "60 Minutes,": "If they proceed, and we get intelligence that they're proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop it." That declaration may be bringing the Americans and Israelis closer together. "I expect the upcoming White House talks will project not only the image but the reality of tighter coordination on Iran's nuclear program," says Dennis Ross, who until recently was a special assistant to the president focused on Iran. "There is really no difference in the primary objective that Iran cannot be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons." The major focus of discussion will be on the timelines and on Israel's concern that the window for military action is closing. 2012-03-05 00:00:00Full Article
Can an American President Promise Preventive War to Assuage an Ally?
(National Journal) James Kitfield - Israel believes that Iran is approaching a "zone of immunity" in the coming months as it buries nuclear infrastructure, and the Israelis don't trust the U.S. to launch its own military strikes if Iran crosses predetermined red lines on the way to a nuclear weapon. As if an American president can promise preventive war to assuage an ally. Martin Indyk, director of the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, and a former U.S. ambassador to Israel, said: "The Iranians keep moving closer to the nuclear-weapons threshold; Israel gets increasingly nervous and threatens military strikes; the United States tightens sanctions in part to try and calm the Israelis; and an Iranian regime that already feels threatened reacts with greater defiance." Having begun by passively insisting that a nuke was "unacceptable" and that "no options were off the table," the administration is now on record saying that Iran's ambitions would provoke action. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently told "60 Minutes,": "If they proceed, and we get intelligence that they're proceeding with developing a nuclear weapon, then we will take whatever steps are necessary to stop it." That declaration may be bringing the Americans and Israelis closer together. "I expect the upcoming White House talks will project not only the image but the reality of tighter coordination on Iran's nuclear program," says Dennis Ross, who until recently was a special assistant to the president focused on Iran. "There is really no difference in the primary objective that Iran cannot be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons." The major focus of discussion will be on the timelines and on Israel's concern that the window for military action is closing. 2012-03-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|