Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Robert Satloff - On the positive side, Obama did not air publicly any of the arguments against military force that whisperers from inside his administration have been telling journalists in recent weeks. Those statements had the effect of undermining the overall thrust of U.S. strategy. On the negative side, by repeatedly saying his administration was committed to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon - but never mentioning the capability to build a nuclear weapon - the president clearly settled the debate about what the goal of U.S. policy really is, in favor of the narrower definition of what Washington is actually trying to prevent (i.e., a weapon, not the broader capability to build a weapon). The writer is executive director of The Washington Institute.2012-03-07 00:00:00Full Article
Between the Lines of Obama's AIPAC Speech
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Robert Satloff - On the positive side, Obama did not air publicly any of the arguments against military force that whisperers from inside his administration have been telling journalists in recent weeks. Those statements had the effect of undermining the overall thrust of U.S. strategy. On the negative side, by repeatedly saying his administration was committed to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon - but never mentioning the capability to build a nuclear weapon - the president clearly settled the debate about what the goal of U.S. policy really is, in favor of the narrower definition of what Washington is actually trying to prevent (i.e., a weapon, not the broader capability to build a weapon). The writer is executive director of The Washington Institute.2012-03-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|