Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Diplomat-Japan) Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - The current dynamic between Iran and the international community has a long history, and the upcoming round of negotiations can't be divorced from the experience of almost ten years of diplomatic efforts to get Iran to back away from its military nuclear ambitions. In every previous round, Iran has used a diplomatic setting to play for time, rather than to negotiate in earnest, and the haggling over the venue could be an indication this trend is likely to continue. There can be little doubt that the demonstrated seriousness of the international community - the U.S. and EU in particular - with regard to sanctions is a major factor behind a greater sense of potential than in the past. Assessments are that the Iranians are feeling the heat of biting sanctions, and the increased threats of military consequences are another important component in their apparent willingness to seek a negotiated outcome. The ten-year experience of not negotiating in good faith means that Iran must prove that it's serious about reaching a deal that in essence will mean giving up on its goal of achieving a military capability in the nuclear realm, before the international community suspends the most crippling sanctions. The critical issues that must be dealt with from the perspective of the international community include the installation of centrifuges and the operation of the Fordow underground enrichment facility; the enrichment of uranium to 20%; the installation of advanced centrifuges; the construction of a heavy-water natural uranium reactor, capable of producing plutonium; the military-related R&D work on the development of a nuclear explosive mechanism at secret facilities; and the development of a nuclear-capable missile warhead. At the more general level, Iran's expressed animosity towards the West must be reduced, and the rejectionist rhetoric and threats of action against Israel in particular must disappear. Emily B. Landau is director of the Arms Control and Regional Security program at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies. Dr. Ephraim Asculai is a Senior Research Fellow at INSS, after more than 40 years at the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. 2012-04-11 00:00:00Full Article
Last Chance with Iran?
(Diplomat-Japan) Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - The current dynamic between Iran and the international community has a long history, and the upcoming round of negotiations can't be divorced from the experience of almost ten years of diplomatic efforts to get Iran to back away from its military nuclear ambitions. In every previous round, Iran has used a diplomatic setting to play for time, rather than to negotiate in earnest, and the haggling over the venue could be an indication this trend is likely to continue. There can be little doubt that the demonstrated seriousness of the international community - the U.S. and EU in particular - with regard to sanctions is a major factor behind a greater sense of potential than in the past. Assessments are that the Iranians are feeling the heat of biting sanctions, and the increased threats of military consequences are another important component in their apparent willingness to seek a negotiated outcome. The ten-year experience of not negotiating in good faith means that Iran must prove that it's serious about reaching a deal that in essence will mean giving up on its goal of achieving a military capability in the nuclear realm, before the international community suspends the most crippling sanctions. The critical issues that must be dealt with from the perspective of the international community include the installation of centrifuges and the operation of the Fordow underground enrichment facility; the enrichment of uranium to 20%; the installation of advanced centrifuges; the construction of a heavy-water natural uranium reactor, capable of producing plutonium; the military-related R&D work on the development of a nuclear explosive mechanism at secret facilities; and the development of a nuclear-capable missile warhead. At the more general level, Iran's expressed animosity towards the West must be reduced, and the rejectionist rhetoric and threats of action against Israel in particular must disappear. Emily B. Landau is director of the Arms Control and Regional Security program at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Security Studies. Dr. Ephraim Asculai is a Senior Research Fellow at INSS, after more than 40 years at the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. 2012-04-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|