Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Richard Cohen- The Israeli Supreme Court has ordered the army to alter a section of the security fence that separates Jewish and Palestinian areas of the West Bank to make it less oppressive to the Palestinians. As a statement of principle, it is head and shoulders above anything any other Middle East government would permit - never mind implement. The Israeli Supreme Court agreed that the security fence is necessary. It did not find it to be a mere land grab, as some critics of the fence have charged. It found the fence a practical way of dealing with the reality of Palestinian terrorism. Bear this decision in mind, please, when next someone refers to the Israelis as "Nazis" or otherwise talks about the nation as if it were a thuggish dictatorship. The court said that the "rule of law and individual liberties" required that the fence be moved - and the Israeli government will comply. The early Zionists wanted Israel to be a light unto other nations. The other day, it was. 2004-07-05 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Day of Light
(Washington Post) Richard Cohen- The Israeli Supreme Court has ordered the army to alter a section of the security fence that separates Jewish and Palestinian areas of the West Bank to make it less oppressive to the Palestinians. As a statement of principle, it is head and shoulders above anything any other Middle East government would permit - never mind implement. The Israeli Supreme Court agreed that the security fence is necessary. It did not find it to be a mere land grab, as some critics of the fence have charged. It found the fence a practical way of dealing with the reality of Palestinian terrorism. Bear this decision in mind, please, when next someone refers to the Israelis as "Nazis" or otherwise talks about the nation as if it were a thuggish dictatorship. The court said that the "rule of law and individual liberties" required that the fence be moved - and the Israeli government will comply. The early Zionists wanted Israel to be a light unto other nations. The other day, it was. 2004-07-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|