Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Commentary) Jonathan S. Tobin - Western negotiators presented a proposal that, while still granting legitimacy to the Iranian nuclear program, did not remove existing sanctions or the threat of an oil embargo. The Iranians view their indignant refusal as just the start of the bargaining process by which they will ultimately get what they want: endorsement of their right to a nuclear program and removal of sanctions. Even if Iran agreed to the current Western proposal, that would by no means alleviate worries about the regime going nuclear. So long as the Iranians are refining uranium - even with the permission to do so only at lower rates of refinement - there is no reason to believe they will give up their quest for a bomb. Indeed, giving their facilities a Western seal of approval will facilitate the continuance of their military project. 2012-05-24 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Isn't Taking the West's First Offer
(Commentary) Jonathan S. Tobin - Western negotiators presented a proposal that, while still granting legitimacy to the Iranian nuclear program, did not remove existing sanctions or the threat of an oil embargo. The Iranians view their indignant refusal as just the start of the bargaining process by which they will ultimately get what they want: endorsement of their right to a nuclear program and removal of sanctions. Even if Iran agreed to the current Western proposal, that would by no means alleviate worries about the regime going nuclear. So long as the Iranians are refining uranium - even with the permission to do so only at lower rates of refinement - there is no reason to believe they will give up their quest for a bomb. Indeed, giving their facilities a Western seal of approval will facilitate the continuance of their military project. 2012-05-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|