Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(World Affairs) - Alan Johnson - I was in Doha last week for the U.S.-Islamic World Forum. Held annually since 9/11, the forum builds "bridges of understanding between the United States and the Muslim World." The forum left me troubled in two respects. First by a pitch made by several speakers to throw Israel overboard, and the good ship "U.S.-Islamic Relations" will steam ahead. Second, by a naive approach among some participants toward one of the most ideologically driven political formations in the Islamic world - the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood doesn't mean what we mean by such words as "freedom," "equality," "democracy," and "rights," and they sense that we don't realize that! One participant asked the constitution writers present to say whether or not they agreed with the following four "no"s: No religious test for citizenship or for any public position, including president. No second-class citizenship on the basis of religion. No legal impediment or social restriction on the freedom of worship. No imposition of religious identity upon the individual by society or state. The silence was deafening. The writer is a professor of democratic theory and practice at Edge Hill University in Lancashire, England. 2012-06-07 00:00:00Full Article
The Muslim Brotherhood and the Four "No"s
(World Affairs) - Alan Johnson - I was in Doha last week for the U.S.-Islamic World Forum. Held annually since 9/11, the forum builds "bridges of understanding between the United States and the Muslim World." The forum left me troubled in two respects. First by a pitch made by several speakers to throw Israel overboard, and the good ship "U.S.-Islamic Relations" will steam ahead. Second, by a naive approach among some participants toward one of the most ideologically driven political formations in the Islamic world - the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood doesn't mean what we mean by such words as "freedom," "equality," "democracy," and "rights," and they sense that we don't realize that! One participant asked the constitution writers present to say whether or not they agreed with the following four "no"s: No religious test for citizenship or for any public position, including president. No second-class citizenship on the basis of religion. No legal impediment or social restriction on the freedom of worship. No imposition of religious identity upon the individual by society or state. The silence was deafening. The writer is a professor of democratic theory and practice at Edge Hill University in Lancashire, England. 2012-06-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|