Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Al-Monitor) Laura Rozen - The Obama administration is considering putting forward a broader proposal to Iran. Those arguing in favor of the "go big" approach say their thinking has been influenced by two recent diplomatic encounters with Iran that cast doubt on the viability of an incremental deal. Senior policy officials at the Defense Department are said to have favored offering a bigger deal to Iran, accompanied by a military threat were it not accepted. International negotiators have, to date, proposed a step-by-step incremental process for resolving international concerns about Iran's nuclear program. They laid out a detailed proposal for an interim confidence-building measure at their last meeting with Iran in Baghdad in May. That proposal asked Iran to stop its 20%-enrichment activities, ship out its stockpile of 20%-enriched uranium, and halt operations at the fortified Fordo uranium-enrichment site. "The Iranians made clear at Baghdad they were not interested," a Western official said. He said the administration sought to trade irreversible concessions for irreversible concessions. "We would view an irreversible concession as the lifting of sanctions. And in return they would have to take an irreversible step." The Iranians seem to be under the mistaken impression that we don't want sanctions to go into effect at the end of June, he said. 2012-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Mulls Seeking Broader Deal in Nuclear Talks with Iran
(Al-Monitor) Laura Rozen - The Obama administration is considering putting forward a broader proposal to Iran. Those arguing in favor of the "go big" approach say their thinking has been influenced by two recent diplomatic encounters with Iran that cast doubt on the viability of an incremental deal. Senior policy officials at the Defense Department are said to have favored offering a bigger deal to Iran, accompanied by a military threat were it not accepted. International negotiators have, to date, proposed a step-by-step incremental process for resolving international concerns about Iran's nuclear program. They laid out a detailed proposal for an interim confidence-building measure at their last meeting with Iran in Baghdad in May. That proposal asked Iran to stop its 20%-enrichment activities, ship out its stockpile of 20%-enriched uranium, and halt operations at the fortified Fordo uranium-enrichment site. "The Iranians made clear at Baghdad they were not interested," a Western official said. He said the administration sought to trade irreversible concessions for irreversible concessions. "We would view an irreversible concession as the lifting of sanctions. And in return they would have to take an irreversible step." The Iranians seem to be under the mistaken impression that we don't want sanctions to go into effect at the end of June, he said. 2012-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|