Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Janine Zacharia - The U.S. states publicly that it remains opposed to settlement activity, but will permit new construction within major settlement blocs which are expected to be absorbed into Israel as part of a final peace deal. Bush endorsed Israel's retention of settlement blocs in his April exchange of letters with Sharon, which led to a reevaluation of U.S. rhetoric on settlement expansion. The road map peace plan of 2002 called for an end to Israeli settlement activity, but Israel says it never accepted a freeze on natural growth and that such a freeze would be impractical. Israeli officials say the Bush administration has privately endorsed the so-called Peres-Powell formula, which says: There will be no new settlements built; no confiscation of new land for residential activities; construction only in already built-up areas; and that the issue of settlements should be resolved as part of a final peace agreement. "Everybody knows the U.S. does not object to natural growth," said Ed Abington, a former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem and a political consultant for the Palestinian Authority. 2004-08-25 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Deliberately Ambiguous on Settlements
(Jerusalem Post) Janine Zacharia - The U.S. states publicly that it remains opposed to settlement activity, but will permit new construction within major settlement blocs which are expected to be absorbed into Israel as part of a final peace deal. Bush endorsed Israel's retention of settlement blocs in his April exchange of letters with Sharon, which led to a reevaluation of U.S. rhetoric on settlement expansion. The road map peace plan of 2002 called for an end to Israeli settlement activity, but Israel says it never accepted a freeze on natural growth and that such a freeze would be impractical. Israeli officials say the Bush administration has privately endorsed the so-called Peres-Powell formula, which says: There will be no new settlements built; no confiscation of new land for residential activities; construction only in already built-up areas; and that the issue of settlements should be resolved as part of a final peace agreement. "Everybody knows the U.S. does not object to natural growth," said Ed Abington, a former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem and a political consultant for the Palestinian Authority. 2004-08-25 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|