Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Raymond Tanter - To facilitate regime change from within Iran requires a dissident organization with the same sort of leadership skills that helped create a coalition to overthrow the shah of Iran. Only one viable group that rejects clerical rule in Iran remains - the Iraq-based Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), the largest group within the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) (the Paris-based parliament-in-exile). In a 2006 study, the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that NCRI's exposure of Iran's secret nuclear program was the trigger for getting the IAEA into Iran. In my research, I have interviewed most of the MEK's leaders, in both Iraq and France, as well as analyzed their foundational statements and documents, and found their positions to be consistent with democratic principles. I found that leaders and rank-and-file of the MEK support a two-state solution to the Palestinian problem and Israel's right to exist. Since 1997, the MEK has been on the list of foreign terror organizations compiled by the State Department. The roots of this ongoing aberration go back to a period when a "moderate" cleric, Mohammad Khatami, was elected as Iran's new president. The Clinton administration saw inclusion of the MEK on the terrorist list as a goodwill gesture to the new regime, with which it was hoping to open a dialogue. To facilitate regime change from within Iran, it is critical to remove the terrorist designation from the MEK. The writer served on the senior staff of the National Security Council in the Reagan administration, and has been a visiting professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 2012-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
Empowering Iran's Opposition
(Ha'aretz) Raymond Tanter - To facilitate regime change from within Iran requires a dissident organization with the same sort of leadership skills that helped create a coalition to overthrow the shah of Iran. Only one viable group that rejects clerical rule in Iran remains - the Iraq-based Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), the largest group within the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) (the Paris-based parliament-in-exile). In a 2006 study, the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that NCRI's exposure of Iran's secret nuclear program was the trigger for getting the IAEA into Iran. In my research, I have interviewed most of the MEK's leaders, in both Iraq and France, as well as analyzed their foundational statements and documents, and found their positions to be consistent with democratic principles. I found that leaders and rank-and-file of the MEK support a two-state solution to the Palestinian problem and Israel's right to exist. Since 1997, the MEK has been on the list of foreign terror organizations compiled by the State Department. The roots of this ongoing aberration go back to a period when a "moderate" cleric, Mohammad Khatami, was elected as Iran's new president. The Clinton administration saw inclusion of the MEK on the terrorist list as a goodwill gesture to the new regime, with which it was hoping to open a dialogue. To facilitate regime change from within Iran, it is critical to remove the terrorist designation from the MEK. The writer served on the senior staff of the National Security Council in the Reagan administration, and has been a visiting professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 2012-06-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|