Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(London Times) Editorial - Saturday's commemorations of the September 11 attacks on America confirmed that the most devastating terrorist outrages the world has seen have not lost their power to shock and move. Those attacks marked the start of the war on terror, a war that is likely to go on for many years. It also marked a profound shift in American foreign policy, making it willing to intervene more aggressively than at any time for a generation. Al-Qaeda had for a decade become bolder because it thought the West lacked the stomach for a fight. When earlier attacks met with a less than resolute response from Washington, the fanatics kept raising the stakes all the way to that attack on the World Trade Center. It is also undeniable that sooner or later Saddam's bloodthirsty regime had to be confronted. Skillful diplomacy might dry up some of the well-springs of hatred. But there will still remain a body of fanatics whose hatred of the West cannot be satisfied by any political solution, and we have no choice but to fight. The critics can carp. But think how loudly they would be wailing had Washington retreated into fortress America. 2004-09-13 00:00:00Full Article
When War is Justified
(London Times) Editorial - Saturday's commemorations of the September 11 attacks on America confirmed that the most devastating terrorist outrages the world has seen have not lost their power to shock and move. Those attacks marked the start of the war on terror, a war that is likely to go on for many years. It also marked a profound shift in American foreign policy, making it willing to intervene more aggressively than at any time for a generation. Al-Qaeda had for a decade become bolder because it thought the West lacked the stomach for a fight. When earlier attacks met with a less than resolute response from Washington, the fanatics kept raising the stakes all the way to that attack on the World Trade Center. It is also undeniable that sooner or later Saddam's bloodthirsty regime had to be confronted. Skillful diplomacy might dry up some of the well-springs of hatred. But there will still remain a body of fanatics whose hatred of the West cannot be satisfied by any political solution, and we have no choice but to fight. The critics can carp. But think how loudly they would be wailing had Washington retreated into fortress America. 2004-09-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|