Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Times-UK] Editorial - The fighting in Lebanon will not easily be halted despite Israeli and Lebanese acceptance of the Security Council resolution on a "cessation of hostilities." The Lebanese government cannot control Hizballah. Nasrallah does not want to stop a war that, he believes, recruits more extremists to the cause with every Israeli bomb dropped. The deployment of a reinforced UN contingent led by France could take weeks. Lebanon's enfeebled government, which contains Hizballah ministers and politicians in league with it, might decide to "authorize" Hizballah's continued military existence, perhaps by bringing its fighters into the Lebanese Army. Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General, has unwisely hinted that "incorporation" might be a way out. There will be no real chance of peace unless UNIFIL disarms Hizballah. The resolution authorizes the UN force "to take all necessary action" and to resist armed efforts to prevent it discharging its duties, but - a curious caveat - only "as it deems within its capabilities." France now says that these capabilities exclude disarming Hizballah; Australia, sensibly, sees no point in committing troops if that is not to be part of their job. 2006-08-14 01:00:00Full Article
Peace in Lebanon Depends on a Robust Force Being Deployed
[Times-UK] Editorial - The fighting in Lebanon will not easily be halted despite Israeli and Lebanese acceptance of the Security Council resolution on a "cessation of hostilities." The Lebanese government cannot control Hizballah. Nasrallah does not want to stop a war that, he believes, recruits more extremists to the cause with every Israeli bomb dropped. The deployment of a reinforced UN contingent led by France could take weeks. Lebanon's enfeebled government, which contains Hizballah ministers and politicians in league with it, might decide to "authorize" Hizballah's continued military existence, perhaps by bringing its fighters into the Lebanese Army. Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary-General, has unwisely hinted that "incorporation" might be a way out. There will be no real chance of peace unless UNIFIL disarms Hizballah. The resolution authorizes the UN force "to take all necessary action" and to resist armed efforts to prevent it discharging its duties, but - a curious caveat - only "as it deems within its capabilities." France now says that these capabilities exclude disarming Hizballah; Australia, sensibly, sees no point in committing troops if that is not to be part of their job. 2006-08-14 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|