Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(BICOM-UK) Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Michael Herzog - Western powers calling for Assad to go are relatively passive in supporting the Syrian opposition. With Assad unwilling to negotiate his own departure and the bulk of the opposition unwilling to negotiate any solution with him, the Annan Plan has little prospect for success and a plan B is required. The Assad regime's departure would deal a serious blow to the Iranian-led axis and encourage those in the region standing up to repression. To maximize the chances of Assad's departure, while minimizing risks, European powers along with the U.S. should adopt a more proactive policy through: significantly increased support for the opposition; further isolation of the regime; continuing to seek Russia's cooperation, while realizing that the more inevitable the fall of the regime looks, the more likely Russia is to engage in a process to replace it. The writer is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2012-07-13 00:00:00Full Article
Syria: How to Advance Transition to a Post-Assad Future
(BICOM-UK) Brig.-Gen. (ret.) Michael Herzog - Western powers calling for Assad to go are relatively passive in supporting the Syrian opposition. With Assad unwilling to negotiate his own departure and the bulk of the opposition unwilling to negotiate any solution with him, the Annan Plan has little prospect for success and a plan B is required. The Assad regime's departure would deal a serious blow to the Iranian-led axis and encourage those in the region standing up to repression. To maximize the chances of Assad's departure, while minimizing risks, European powers along with the U.S. should adopt a more proactive policy through: significantly increased support for the opposition; further isolation of the regime; continuing to seek Russia's cooperation, while realizing that the more inevitable the fall of the regime looks, the more likely Russia is to engage in a process to replace it. The writer is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2012-07-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|