Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) David Horovitz - The warm public words expressed by both sides about U.S.-Israeli coordination are heartfelt. Behind the scenes, the exchanges of information and assessment are truly open, serious and constructive. But there is one great unspoken secret at the heart of this relationship between two true allies facing what, for one of them - the weaker and more immediately threatened one - is a potentially existential danger: There is absolutely no circumstance whatsoever in which the U.S. will empathize with an Israeli decision to strike alone at Iran's nuclear facilities. If the U.S. concludes that only military action can thwart Iran, then the president will order such action, officials insist, after having made clear to the international community that diplomacy and sanctions had failed, and that there really was no alternative. And that were Iran to restart the program after a U.S.-led military strike, the U.S. would have no compunction about striking again if necessary, as often as was deemed necessary. Therefore, any resort to force before an American resort to force would be "premature." 2012-07-16 00:00:00Full Article
The Unspoken Secret at the Heart of U.S.-Israel Coordination on Iran
(Times of Israel) David Horovitz - The warm public words expressed by both sides about U.S.-Israeli coordination are heartfelt. Behind the scenes, the exchanges of information and assessment are truly open, serious and constructive. But there is one great unspoken secret at the heart of this relationship between two true allies facing what, for one of them - the weaker and more immediately threatened one - is a potentially existential danger: There is absolutely no circumstance whatsoever in which the U.S. will empathize with an Israeli decision to strike alone at Iran's nuclear facilities. If the U.S. concludes that only military action can thwart Iran, then the president will order such action, officials insist, after having made clear to the international community that diplomacy and sanctions had failed, and that there really was no alternative. And that were Iran to restart the program after a U.S.-led military strike, the U.S. would have no compunction about striking again if necessary, as often as was deemed necessary. Therefore, any resort to force before an American resort to force would be "premature." 2012-07-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|