Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Weekly Standard) Elliott Abrams - Why would Israel, with so much less power than the U.S., decide to take on a task at the far outer edge of its military capacities? Why not leave that task to the superpower, which would do a much better job? The answer is simple: Israelis do not believe the U.S. will perform the task - will ever use military force, even as a last resort, to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In that belief Israel's view is shared by Iran. Iran's leaders feel free to delay forever, present ridiculous proposals, and refuse to engage in serious bargaining. Meanwhile they push their nuclear program forward. An effort by the president to seek a formal authorization for the use of force from Congress is a way for him to show seriousness of purpose, and for Congress to support it - and send an unmistakable message to the ayatollahs. Such a proposal would be controversial, but its very presentation would show a new level of clarity and commitment. And should such a resolution fail, everyone would be clear that the U.S. was not going to act and that Israel need delay no longer.2012-08-23 00:00:00Full Article
Time to Authorize Use of Force Against Iran
(Weekly Standard) Elliott Abrams - Why would Israel, with so much less power than the U.S., decide to take on a task at the far outer edge of its military capacities? Why not leave that task to the superpower, which would do a much better job? The answer is simple: Israelis do not believe the U.S. will perform the task - will ever use military force, even as a last resort, to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In that belief Israel's view is shared by Iran. Iran's leaders feel free to delay forever, present ridiculous proposals, and refuse to engage in serious bargaining. Meanwhile they push their nuclear program forward. An effort by the president to seek a formal authorization for the use of force from Congress is a way for him to show seriousness of purpose, and for Congress to support it - and send an unmistakable message to the ayatollahs. Such a proposal would be controversial, but its very presentation would show a new level of clarity and commitment. And should such a resolution fail, everyone would be clear that the U.S. was not going to act and that Israel need delay no longer.2012-08-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|