Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(The Volokh Conspiracy) David E. Bernstein - Reading different accounts of an Israeli court's decision to deny a judgment for Rachel Corrie's parents, I've come up with a pretty clear dividing line for sound coverage and poor coverage. Sound coverage at the very least mentions that Corrie was working for the International Solidarity Movement, an organization that supports Palestinian terrorism, has served as cover for terrorists, and encourages its participants to insert themselves in dangerous situations where they may suffer "martyrdom." The real reason the Rachel Corrie story stays alive is that the International Solidarity Movement has made her into a secular saint, portraying her as an innocent "peace" and "human rights" activist whose life was cruelly shortened by the same Israeli military that is oppressing the Palestinians. But anyone who cares to look up the ISM can see that it's not a "peace" or "human rights" organization, but an organization dedicated to Palestinian "liberation" that supports violence against Israeli civilians. Most Westerners, and certainly most Americans, have some real problems with bestowing sainthood on someone who was working on behalf of a pro-terrorism organization, which is precisely why her supporters try to obscure exactly what she was doing, for whom, and for what purpose, at the time. The writer is a professor at the George Mason University School of Law. 2012-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
Coverage of the Rachel Corrie Verdict
(The Volokh Conspiracy) David E. Bernstein - Reading different accounts of an Israeli court's decision to deny a judgment for Rachel Corrie's parents, I've come up with a pretty clear dividing line for sound coverage and poor coverage. Sound coverage at the very least mentions that Corrie was working for the International Solidarity Movement, an organization that supports Palestinian terrorism, has served as cover for terrorists, and encourages its participants to insert themselves in dangerous situations where they may suffer "martyrdom." The real reason the Rachel Corrie story stays alive is that the International Solidarity Movement has made her into a secular saint, portraying her as an innocent "peace" and "human rights" activist whose life was cruelly shortened by the same Israeli military that is oppressing the Palestinians. But anyone who cares to look up the ISM can see that it's not a "peace" or "human rights" organization, but an organization dedicated to Palestinian "liberation" that supports violence against Israeli civilians. Most Westerners, and certainly most Americans, have some real problems with bestowing sainthood on someone who was working on behalf of a pro-terrorism organization, which is precisely why her supporters try to obscure exactly what she was doing, for whom, and for what purpose, at the time. The writer is a professor at the George Mason University School of Law. 2012-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|