Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - Israel's Security Cabinet met Tuesday for ten hours to hear intelligence assessments and conduct an in-depth discussion on Iran. It is likely that among the issues discussed were the "red lines" that Israel would like the U.S. to establish as a way of deterring Iran from moving ahead. Uzi Arad, former head of the National Security Council, said that they could include a declaration that any uranium enrichment beyond 20% would be a direct trigger for military action. Arad told Israel Radio that other possible red lines could be the discovery of additional uranium enrichment plants or interference with the work of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. In addition, Arad said the U.S. has not yet spoken in "categorical terms" about its determination to stop the Iranian nuclear march. An example of this would be clearer presidential declarations that the U.S. will not tolerate or allow a nuclear Iran, and will use all means to prevent it. Another "categorical" expression could be a clear statement that the military objective of any U.S. action would not be to "buy time," but rather to prevent Iran from ever being able to build a nuclear bomb. 2012-09-05 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Security Cabinet Convenes on Iran
(Jerusalem Post) Herb Keinon - Israel's Security Cabinet met Tuesday for ten hours to hear intelligence assessments and conduct an in-depth discussion on Iran. It is likely that among the issues discussed were the "red lines" that Israel would like the U.S. to establish as a way of deterring Iran from moving ahead. Uzi Arad, former head of the National Security Council, said that they could include a declaration that any uranium enrichment beyond 20% would be a direct trigger for military action. Arad told Israel Radio that other possible red lines could be the discovery of additional uranium enrichment plants or interference with the work of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. In addition, Arad said the U.S. has not yet spoken in "categorical terms" about its determination to stop the Iranian nuclear march. An example of this would be clearer presidential declarations that the U.S. will not tolerate or allow a nuclear Iran, and will use all means to prevent it. Another "categorical" expression could be a clear statement that the military objective of any U.S. action would not be to "buy time," but rather to prevent Iran from ever being able to build a nuclear bomb. 2012-09-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|