Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Weekly Standard) Eric Trager - Rather than put conditions on America's generous package of economic and military aid, the U.S. has often appeared to believe that through deeper engagement, it can build friendlier relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and convince it to soften its hostile, intolerant views. A new RAND report, "The Muslim Brotherhood, Its Youth, and Implications for U.S. Engagement," states: "Engagement offers both sides an opportunity to dispel misunderstandings." However, the argument for engaging the Brotherhood ignores some important facts. The Brotherhood is a deeply ideological outfit with a historically anti-Western outlook. It seeks to establish an Islamic state in Egypt, has long opposed Egypt's peace treaty with Israel, and holds deeply intolerant views towards religious minorities. Young members are subjected to a rigorous five-to-eight-year process of internal promotion, repeatedly tested on their completion of the Brotherhood's educational curriculum. Closed, theocratic organizations do not become moderate when they are embraced unconditionally. They moderate when they are being squeezed and find themselves without other options. The writer is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2012-11-06 00:00:00Full Article
Engaging the Muslim Brotherhood
(Weekly Standard) Eric Trager - Rather than put conditions on America's generous package of economic and military aid, the U.S. has often appeared to believe that through deeper engagement, it can build friendlier relations with the Muslim Brotherhood and convince it to soften its hostile, intolerant views. A new RAND report, "The Muslim Brotherhood, Its Youth, and Implications for U.S. Engagement," states: "Engagement offers both sides an opportunity to dispel misunderstandings." However, the argument for engaging the Brotherhood ignores some important facts. The Brotherhood is a deeply ideological outfit with a historically anti-Western outlook. It seeks to establish an Islamic state in Egypt, has long opposed Egypt's peace treaty with Israel, and holds deeply intolerant views towards religious minorities. Young members are subjected to a rigorous five-to-eight-year process of internal promotion, repeatedly tested on their completion of the Brotherhood's educational curriculum. Closed, theocratic organizations do not become moderate when they are embraced unconditionally. They moderate when they are being squeezed and find themselves without other options. The writer is a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2012-11-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|