Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(BBC News) Guglielmo Verdirame - Israel argues that its Gaza operation is justified under the right of self-defense. This position has in principle been supported by various countries, including the U.S. and EU member states. Enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter, the right of self-defense is accepted as a fundamental principle of international law. It is universally agreed that a state can defend itself against an armed attack. Most international lawyers would agree that rockets launched against civilians that disrupt the social life of part of a country constitute an armed attack for the purposes of Article 51. Critics of the Israeli position argue that the right of self-defense should be invoked only against another state, but not against a non-state entity like Gaza. State practice, especially since the attacks of 11 September 2001, militates against this interpretation of self-defense. The writer is professor of International Law at King's College London. 2012-11-23 00:00:00Full Article
Gaza Crisis: The Legal Position of Israel and Hamas
(BBC News) Guglielmo Verdirame - Israel argues that its Gaza operation is justified under the right of self-defense. This position has in principle been supported by various countries, including the U.S. and EU member states. Enshrined in Article 51 of the UN Charter, the right of self-defense is accepted as a fundamental principle of international law. It is universally agreed that a state can defend itself against an armed attack. Most international lawyers would agree that rockets launched against civilians that disrupt the social life of part of a country constitute an armed attack for the purposes of Article 51. Critics of the Israeli position argue that the right of self-defense should be invoked only against another state, but not against a non-state entity like Gaza. State practice, especially since the attacks of 11 September 2001, militates against this interpretation of self-defense. The writer is professor of International Law at King's College London. 2012-11-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|