Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times)Benny Morris - Arafat didn't want and never really acquiesced in the idea of a stunted West Bank-Gaza state, and in his vision accurately reflected the general will of his people. Arafat spoke clearly and insistently of the return of Palestine to its "rightful owners." Nothing less. Whatever deluded Westerners might believe, Arafat was no liberal, taking account of others' views and feelings, and seeking solutions through conciliation and compromise. In Arafat's eyes and those of his people, there is only one justice: Palestinian justice. Arafat was probably the only Palestinian of our time capable of persuading most of the Palestinians to accept the concessions necessary to achieve a two-state solution. His successors may be more amenable to territorial compromise, but they lack the stature to intimidate or persuade their people to accept a two-state settlement or to crush their terror-minded colleagues. So Arafat's death may have done us no good at all. 2004-11-12 00:00:00Full Article
A Difficult Visionary, a Stubborn Vision
(New York Times)Benny Morris - Arafat didn't want and never really acquiesced in the idea of a stunted West Bank-Gaza state, and in his vision accurately reflected the general will of his people. Arafat spoke clearly and insistently of the return of Palestine to its "rightful owners." Nothing less. Whatever deluded Westerners might believe, Arafat was no liberal, taking account of others' views and feelings, and seeking solutions through conciliation and compromise. In Arafat's eyes and those of his people, there is only one justice: Palestinian justice. Arafat was probably the only Palestinian of our time capable of persuading most of the Palestinians to accept the concessions necessary to achieve a two-state solution. His successors may be more amenable to territorial compromise, but they lack the stature to intimidate or persuade their people to accept a two-state settlement or to crush their terror-minded colleagues. So Arafat's death may have done us no good at all. 2004-11-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|