Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
Daniel Gordis - (American Jewish Committee) Israel is at war - not against "militants," or against those who would seek to "liberate" the Palestinian people. Israel is engaged in a war for its survival, against well-armed and increasingly well-trained, highly disciplined groups of terrorists. Their agenda is not the liberation of the "territories" that were captured in June 1967 in a war that Israel did not want. Their agenda, as Hamas and Hizballah (among others) freely admit, is the eradication of the "Zionist entity" from what should be, in their minds, an exclusively Muslim Middle East. This war began immediately after Ehud Barak offered the Palestinian people the state and the independence they had always said their decades-long terrorist campaign had been designed to bring them. Most Israelis now understand that there will not be peace. Not in our lifetimes, and probably not in the lifetimes of our children. When Palestinian terrorists fled into the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, Israeli troops surrounded the church, but didn't storm it. Compare this to the Americans' treatment of mosques in Najaf or Falluja, when their patience with Moqtada Al-Sadr ran out, or what we know would have been the case had Jews been hiding in a church or a synagogue and it had been Palestinians pursuing them. Israel is a country in which a vigorous and open debate about how to balance the needs for security with Jewish humanitarian values continues. Where are the Palestinians arguing in their streets for a cessation to the bombings, to the Kassam rockets, to the shootings, so that their lives can be restored to normal? Where are the graffiti calling for an end to the terror that brought the security fence in the first place? Or the graffiti that note that, if only Arafat had continued to negotiate, none of this would have happened? The world calls Israel racist, but the only population that Sharon is considering moving is the Jewish population in Gaza, not the villages that openly harbor the terrorists who seek to kill our children. As the battle against Islamic terror spreads, and as Westerners experience ever more terror firsthand, the world will come to admire the restraint and fortitude with which Israel has fought for its life.2004-12-07 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Morality and the World's Myopia
Daniel Gordis - (American Jewish Committee) Israel is at war - not against "militants," or against those who would seek to "liberate" the Palestinian people. Israel is engaged in a war for its survival, against well-armed and increasingly well-trained, highly disciplined groups of terrorists. Their agenda is not the liberation of the "territories" that were captured in June 1967 in a war that Israel did not want. Their agenda, as Hamas and Hizballah (among others) freely admit, is the eradication of the "Zionist entity" from what should be, in their minds, an exclusively Muslim Middle East. This war began immediately after Ehud Barak offered the Palestinian people the state and the independence they had always said their decades-long terrorist campaign had been designed to bring them. Most Israelis now understand that there will not be peace. Not in our lifetimes, and probably not in the lifetimes of our children. When Palestinian terrorists fled into the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, Israeli troops surrounded the church, but didn't storm it. Compare this to the Americans' treatment of mosques in Najaf or Falluja, when their patience with Moqtada Al-Sadr ran out, or what we know would have been the case had Jews been hiding in a church or a synagogue and it had been Palestinians pursuing them. Israel is a country in which a vigorous and open debate about how to balance the needs for security with Jewish humanitarian values continues. Where are the Palestinians arguing in their streets for a cessation to the bombings, to the Kassam rockets, to the shootings, so that their lives can be restored to normal? Where are the graffiti calling for an end to the terror that brought the security fence in the first place? Or the graffiti that note that, if only Arafat had continued to negotiate, none of this would have happened? The world calls Israel racist, but the only population that Sharon is considering moving is the Jewish population in Gaza, not the villages that openly harbor the terrorists who seek to kill our children. As the battle against Islamic terror spreads, and as Westerners experience ever more terror firsthand, the world will come to admire the restraint and fortitude with which Israel has fought for its life.2004-12-07 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|