Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Efraim Inbar - The new change in tone from Cairo does not necessarily reflect a strategic decision to change Egypt's policy toward Israel. The democratization component of U.S. policy is particularly threatening to dictatorships like the Egyptian regime. Egypt prefers to see the Americans busy with peace efforts in the Israeli-Palestinian arena rather than pushing for reform in the Arab world. Egypt well understands that the Bush vision of a resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict is closer to its own vision than to Sharon's prescription. A renewal of Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Syrian peace talks might therefore put stress on Israel's relationship with Washington. In addition, the impetus for Cairo's new approach stems from the uncertainty surrounding the future of Gaza following an Israeli withdrawal. Cairo's fear that a Hamas-led Islamic state would be established on the Gaza-Egypt border forced it to abandon an understandable reluctance to play a more active role there. Moreover, the terrorist attack on the Taba Hilton in October has a Palestinian link which has pushed Egypt into greater cooperation with Israel. It wants to improve the overall security environment so as to reduce terror emanating from Gaza. Israel should welcome any improvement in bilateral relations. However, Jerusalem must demand that Cairo live up to its peace treaty commitments, including a reform of the Egyptian school curriculum with a view to imbuing the next generation of Egyptians with a more positive attitude toward Israel. The slight changes in Egyptian positions we are now seeing are easily reversible, but they could reflect a step toward the reluctant acceptance of Israel as a fait accompli. 2004-12-16 00:00:00Full Article
Reading the Egyptian Sphinx
(Jerusalem Post) Efraim Inbar - The new change in tone from Cairo does not necessarily reflect a strategic decision to change Egypt's policy toward Israel. The democratization component of U.S. policy is particularly threatening to dictatorships like the Egyptian regime. Egypt prefers to see the Americans busy with peace efforts in the Israeli-Palestinian arena rather than pushing for reform in the Arab world. Egypt well understands that the Bush vision of a resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict is closer to its own vision than to Sharon's prescription. A renewal of Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Syrian peace talks might therefore put stress on Israel's relationship with Washington. In addition, the impetus for Cairo's new approach stems from the uncertainty surrounding the future of Gaza following an Israeli withdrawal. Cairo's fear that a Hamas-led Islamic state would be established on the Gaza-Egypt border forced it to abandon an understandable reluctance to play a more active role there. Moreover, the terrorist attack on the Taba Hilton in October has a Palestinian link which has pushed Egypt into greater cooperation with Israel. It wants to improve the overall security environment so as to reduce terror emanating from Gaza. Israel should welcome any improvement in bilateral relations. However, Jerusalem must demand that Cairo live up to its peace treaty commitments, including a reform of the Egyptian school curriculum with a view to imbuing the next generation of Egyptians with a more positive attitude toward Israel. The slight changes in Egyptian positions we are now seeing are easily reversible, but they could reflect a step toward the reluctant acceptance of Israel as a fait accompli. 2004-12-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|