Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Financial Times-UK) James Blitz - Nuclear experts in the U.S. and Middle East have raised concerns about the security of up to 50 tons of unenriched uranium in Syria. David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security, said: "There are real worries about what has happened to the uranium that Syria was planning to put into the Al-Kibar reactor shortly before the reactor was destroyed in 2007." Experts have concluded that Al-Kibar would have needed about 50 tons of natural uranium fuel to become operational. Such a stockpile would be enough to provide weapons-grade fuel for five atomic devices. Some government officials have raised concerns that Iran, which urgently needs uranium for its nuclear program, might try to seize Syria's stockpile. Their fears have been triggered by signs of movement at what they allege is a secret uranium conversion facility at Marj al-Sultan near Damascus. The officials said: "Syria is almost certainly in possession of good quality uranium of the type that Iran has been trying to acquire on the international market for years. It would certainly be possible to transfer this from Syria to Iran by air." 2013-01-09 00:00:00Full Article
Fears Raised over Syria's Uranium Stockpile
(Financial Times-UK) James Blitz - Nuclear experts in the U.S. and Middle East have raised concerns about the security of up to 50 tons of unenriched uranium in Syria. David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security, said: "There are real worries about what has happened to the uranium that Syria was planning to put into the Al-Kibar reactor shortly before the reactor was destroyed in 2007." Experts have concluded that Al-Kibar would have needed about 50 tons of natural uranium fuel to become operational. Such a stockpile would be enough to provide weapons-grade fuel for five atomic devices. Some government officials have raised concerns that Iran, which urgently needs uranium for its nuclear program, might try to seize Syria's stockpile. Their fears have been triggered by signs of movement at what they allege is a secret uranium conversion facility at Marj al-Sultan near Damascus. The officials said: "Syria is almost certainly in possession of good quality uranium of the type that Iran has been trying to acquire on the international market for years. It would certainly be possible to transfer this from Syria to Iran by air." 2013-01-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|