Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Telegraph-UK] Con Coughlin - However much the Hizballah leadership might claim to be a legitimate, democratically elected political party, the reality is that it is, and always has been, a proxy of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, who finance, train, and equip the militia as a means of maintaining a permanent security challenge to Israel's northern border. In the past, captured Israeli soldiers and airmen have been transported via Syria to Iran for safekeeping while Hizballah undertakes the tortuous negotiating process. By forcibly closing the main exit routes, the Israelis are trying to ensure the soldiers remain in Lebanon. The Beirut authorities have only themselves to blame for allowing Hizballah to maintain a permanent armed presence in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese have singularly failed to rein in Hizballah. As a consequence, Hizballah has been allowed to develop a state within a state, with its own well-equipped private army - all of it funded by the Iranians. Certainly the Israelis are well within their rights to hold Beirut accountable for Hizballah's provocative presence on their northern border, which has effectively become Iran's front line. 2006-07-14 01:00:00Full Article
Israeli Crisis a Smokescreen for Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
[Telegraph-UK] Con Coughlin - However much the Hizballah leadership might claim to be a legitimate, democratically elected political party, the reality is that it is, and always has been, a proxy of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, who finance, train, and equip the militia as a means of maintaining a permanent security challenge to Israel's northern border. In the past, captured Israeli soldiers and airmen have been transported via Syria to Iran for safekeeping while Hizballah undertakes the tortuous negotiating process. By forcibly closing the main exit routes, the Israelis are trying to ensure the soldiers remain in Lebanon. The Beirut authorities have only themselves to blame for allowing Hizballah to maintain a permanent armed presence in southern Lebanon. The Lebanese have singularly failed to rein in Hizballah. As a consequence, Hizballah has been allowed to develop a state within a state, with its own well-equipped private army - all of it funded by the Iranians. Certainly the Israelis are well within their rights to hold Beirut accountable for Hizballah's provocative presence on their northern border, which has effectively become Iran's front line. 2006-07-14 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|