Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Washington Institute for Near East Policy] Robert Satloff - After a short-lived romance with the possibility of reaching a full-scale Israeli-Palestinian agreement on the core issues - Jerusalem, territory, security, and refugees - the Annapolis hosts realized that the step-by-step philosophy embodied in the Roadmap was essential. Israel made an important procedural concession: acceptance that negotiations for the third phase of the Roadmap (creation of a Palestinian state) can proceed without full compliance on the first phase's security obligations. But however much U.S. officials would like to broker agreements on the core issues, it is clear that the focus is on devising a mechanism to define, execute, and monitor the security-related terms of the first phase. Washington tried this before in 2003 and failed. U.S. officials expect Arab states will no longer insist on normalization at the end of the process, and instead implement aspects of normalization in parallel with Israel's early discussion of final status issues. 2007-11-20 01:00:00Full Article
Critical Questions for Annapolis and Beyond
[Washington Institute for Near East Policy] Robert Satloff - After a short-lived romance with the possibility of reaching a full-scale Israeli-Palestinian agreement on the core issues - Jerusalem, territory, security, and refugees - the Annapolis hosts realized that the step-by-step philosophy embodied in the Roadmap was essential. Israel made an important procedural concession: acceptance that negotiations for the third phase of the Roadmap (creation of a Palestinian state) can proceed without full compliance on the first phase's security obligations. But however much U.S. officials would like to broker agreements on the core issues, it is clear that the focus is on devising a mechanism to define, execute, and monitor the security-related terms of the first phase. Washington tried this before in 2003 and failed. U.S. officials expect Arab states will no longer insist on normalization at the end of the process, and instead implement aspects of normalization in parallel with Israel's early discussion of final status issues. 2007-11-20 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|