Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Gatestone Institute) Khaled Abu Toameh - Today, it is clearer than ever that neither Hamas nor Fatah is interested in achieving unity - each for its own reasons. For Hamas, ending the dispute means the Islamist movement would have to cede exclusive control over Gaza - an area that has been turned into a semi-independent Islamic emirate over the past five years. For Fatah, unity with Hamas means paving the way for the Islamist movement to extend its control to the West Bank - something Abbas and his supporters are afraid of and cannot afford. Obama and the rest of the international community need to understand that the Palestinians already have two separate entities - with social, political and religious observance and ideologies that totally conflict. By the way, Fatah's public endorsement of the two-state solution does not necessarily mean it has abandoned the phased plan - namely, take whatever you can now and fight in the future to get the rest. Even if Mahmoud Abbas agrees to return to the negotiating table with Israel, it is obvious that any agreement he reaches will be automatically rejected by the radicals. 2013-02-20 00:00:00Full Article
What Is Really Blocking the Peace Process?
(Gatestone Institute) Khaled Abu Toameh - Today, it is clearer than ever that neither Hamas nor Fatah is interested in achieving unity - each for its own reasons. For Hamas, ending the dispute means the Islamist movement would have to cede exclusive control over Gaza - an area that has been turned into a semi-independent Islamic emirate over the past five years. For Fatah, unity with Hamas means paving the way for the Islamist movement to extend its control to the West Bank - something Abbas and his supporters are afraid of and cannot afford. Obama and the rest of the international community need to understand that the Palestinians already have two separate entities - with social, political and religious observance and ideologies that totally conflict. By the way, Fatah's public endorsement of the two-state solution does not necessarily mean it has abandoned the phased plan - namely, take whatever you can now and fight in the future to get the rest. Even if Mahmoud Abbas agrees to return to the negotiating table with Israel, it is obvious that any agreement he reaches will be automatically rejected by the radicals. 2013-02-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|