Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Asharq Al-Awsat-UK) Adel Al Toraifi - When the Arab Spring broke out, Hizbullah adopted the official Iranian stance in support of regime change, but as the uprisings continued, Syria changed the rules of the game, whereby Hizbullah sided with the Assad regime at the expense of unarmed Syrian citizens. This can be considered the critical moment when the party lost its regional popularity, and transformed into a sectarian and ideological opponent for broad sectors of the region. Hizbullah is no longer considered a hero in the Arab world, but rather the odious enemy of the masses, who used to boast of the party's achievements a few years ago. This could change the position of Hizbullah and its forces not only in Lebanon but in the whole region. In the event of the fall of the Assad regime, there are no guarantees that the war will not spread towards Hizbullah's areas of influence inside Lebanon, and the party could soon find itself confronted by many forces greater than it. 2013-03-01 00:00:00Full Article
The Future of Hizbullah
(Asharq Al-Awsat-UK) Adel Al Toraifi - When the Arab Spring broke out, Hizbullah adopted the official Iranian stance in support of regime change, but as the uprisings continued, Syria changed the rules of the game, whereby Hizbullah sided with the Assad regime at the expense of unarmed Syrian citizens. This can be considered the critical moment when the party lost its regional popularity, and transformed into a sectarian and ideological opponent for broad sectors of the region. Hizbullah is no longer considered a hero in the Arab world, but rather the odious enemy of the masses, who used to boast of the party's achievements a few years ago. This could change the position of Hizbullah and its forces not only in Lebanon but in the whole region. In the event of the fall of the Assad regime, there are no guarantees that the war will not spread towards Hizbullah's areas of influence inside Lebanon, and the party could soon find itself confronted by many forces greater than it. 2013-03-01 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|