Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post)Michael Melchior - With talk of a new window of opportunity for peace-making in the air, and before we throw ourselves into a new process, let's identify what went wrong with the Oslo peace process. Never has an international initiative received so much support, funding, and international goodwill. And we have to admit that Oslo - not the concept, but the result - failed miserably. The process lacked a legitimate foothold and identity within Palestinian and Israeli society because the main source of legitimization and identity among both Jews and Arabs is culture and religion. Palestinians hearing talk of a "new Middle East" understood it as an attempt to replace traditionalism with secularization - something even the mainstream could not tolerate. If we approach peace-making yet again as merely a process between politicians, we risk getting the same bad results. The writer was deputy foreign minister (2001). 2004-12-24 00:00:00Full Article
An Oslo Post-Mortem
(Jerusalem Post)Michael Melchior - With talk of a new window of opportunity for peace-making in the air, and before we throw ourselves into a new process, let's identify what went wrong with the Oslo peace process. Never has an international initiative received so much support, funding, and international goodwill. And we have to admit that Oslo - not the concept, but the result - failed miserably. The process lacked a legitimate foothold and identity within Palestinian and Israeli society because the main source of legitimization and identity among both Jews and Arabs is culture and religion. Palestinians hearing talk of a "new Middle East" understood it as an attempt to replace traditionalism with secularization - something even the mainstream could not tolerate. If we approach peace-making yet again as merely a process between politicians, we risk getting the same bad results. The writer was deputy foreign minister (2001). 2004-12-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|