Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) - Editorial France and Germany have finally responded to Iraq's flagrant violation of UN disarmament orders by mounting an offensive - against the United States. On Monday in Brussels, the two European governments, seconded by tiny Belgium, blocked the NATO alliance from making preparations to defend Turkey in the event of a war, even though the planning was supported by the alliance's 16 other members. Meanwhile, they sought support from Russia for a proposal to increase UN inspectors, although Hans Blix, the chief of the inspection team, said Monday that, "The principal problem is not the number of inspectors but rather the active cooperation of the Iraqi side." One result will be the enfeebling of both NATO and the UN - the very disaster that Germany and France once feared. Only six months ago it was Germany and France that appealed to the U.S. to take the case of Iraqi disarmament to the UN; a year ago they reproached Washington for not involving NATO more in the war against terrorism. With France's support, the Security Council crafted Resolution 1441, which gave Iraq "a final opportunity" to peacefully disarm while making clear that anything short of "full cooperation" at "any time" would forfeit the chance. The Security Council risks a crippling forfeit of its credibility if it backs down now - yet that is exactly what France and Germany propose. Saddam Hussein is trying to create the illusion of cooperation through incremental procedural concessions, such as the reported acceptance Monday of surveillance flights. But there remains no substance. More and more, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder behave as if they share the same overriding goal as the Iraqi dictator: thwarting U.S. action even when it is supported by most other NATO and European nations. They have next to no chance of succeeding, but they could poison international relations for years to come.2003-02-11 00:00:00Full Article
Standing With Saddam
(Washington Post) - Editorial France and Germany have finally responded to Iraq's flagrant violation of UN disarmament orders by mounting an offensive - against the United States. On Monday in Brussels, the two European governments, seconded by tiny Belgium, blocked the NATO alliance from making preparations to defend Turkey in the event of a war, even though the planning was supported by the alliance's 16 other members. Meanwhile, they sought support from Russia for a proposal to increase UN inspectors, although Hans Blix, the chief of the inspection team, said Monday that, "The principal problem is not the number of inspectors but rather the active cooperation of the Iraqi side." One result will be the enfeebling of both NATO and the UN - the very disaster that Germany and France once feared. Only six months ago it was Germany and France that appealed to the U.S. to take the case of Iraqi disarmament to the UN; a year ago they reproached Washington for not involving NATO more in the war against terrorism. With France's support, the Security Council crafted Resolution 1441, which gave Iraq "a final opportunity" to peacefully disarm while making clear that anything short of "full cooperation" at "any time" would forfeit the chance. The Security Council risks a crippling forfeit of its credibility if it backs down now - yet that is exactly what France and Germany propose. Saddam Hussein is trying to create the illusion of cooperation through incremental procedural concessions, such as the reported acceptance Monday of surveillance flights. But there remains no substance. More and more, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder behave as if they share the same overriding goal as the Iraqi dictator: thwarting U.S. action even when it is supported by most other NATO and European nations. They have next to no chance of succeeding, but they could poison international relations for years to come.2003-02-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|