Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) - Gerald M. Steinberg The departure of the American forces from Saudi Arabia once the war with Iraq is over will create new and more menacing difficulties for the U.S., Israel, and other countries. If the huge arsenals of the world's most advanced weapons become available to radical groups and Islamic terrorists, this would create a catastrophic case of "blowback." After the war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, guerrillas who were trained and armed by the U.S. (including bin Laden) turned their weapons against their former benefactors. The potential blowback from the Saudi arsenal of advanced aircraft and missiles would be many times more devastating. For over 30 years, Saudi defense officials (princes of the royal family) have been converting a significant portion of their oil income into weapons. Multi-billion dollar deals to acquire large numbers of the most advanced combat aircraft, tanks, missiles, and other systems have made Saudi Arabia one of the most highly armed countries in the world. In the early 1980s (and despite strenuous objections from Israel and within the U.S.), the Reagan Administration agreed to sell AWACS airborne battle stations to the Saudis, as well as F-15s (over 150 of these advanced fighter-bombers are now in the Saudi inventory), and tactical missiles such as Maverick and Sidewinder. In addition, weapons purchased from France and Britain should not be overlooked. If the U.S. and other Western forces depart, huge stockpiles of some of the most advanced weapons in the world would no longer be locked away. In the likely event of a major political upheaval in Saudi Arabia, and the replacement of the royal family with an Islamic regime that is closely aligned with Islamic radicals or terror groups, these weapons could become a central element in the war against the U.S. and the West. In addition, the intercontinental ballistic missiles purchased from China many years ago provide the foundation for a Saudi strategic force. Given the scale of these dangers, American post-war planning for Saudi Arabia should neutralize the blowback scenario. If or when the U.S. forces depart, they should be sure to take all their baggage with them. The advanced aircraft, missiles, electronics and other systems can be flown or shipped out (with compensation based on the residual value of these weapons, of course). Whatever cannot be moved, such as the bases, radar antennas, and ground facilities, must be destroyed.2003-02-21 00:00:00Full Article
The Danger of Saudi "Blowback"
(Jerusalem Post) - Gerald M. Steinberg The departure of the American forces from Saudi Arabia once the war with Iraq is over will create new and more menacing difficulties for the U.S., Israel, and other countries. If the huge arsenals of the world's most advanced weapons become available to radical groups and Islamic terrorists, this would create a catastrophic case of "blowback." After the war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, guerrillas who were trained and armed by the U.S. (including bin Laden) turned their weapons against their former benefactors. The potential blowback from the Saudi arsenal of advanced aircraft and missiles would be many times more devastating. For over 30 years, Saudi defense officials (princes of the royal family) have been converting a significant portion of their oil income into weapons. Multi-billion dollar deals to acquire large numbers of the most advanced combat aircraft, tanks, missiles, and other systems have made Saudi Arabia one of the most highly armed countries in the world. In the early 1980s (and despite strenuous objections from Israel and within the U.S.), the Reagan Administration agreed to sell AWACS airborne battle stations to the Saudis, as well as F-15s (over 150 of these advanced fighter-bombers are now in the Saudi inventory), and tactical missiles such as Maverick and Sidewinder. In addition, weapons purchased from France and Britain should not be overlooked. If the U.S. and other Western forces depart, huge stockpiles of some of the most advanced weapons in the world would no longer be locked away. In the likely event of a major political upheaval in Saudi Arabia, and the replacement of the royal family with an Islamic regime that is closely aligned with Islamic radicals or terror groups, these weapons could become a central element in the war against the U.S. and the West. In addition, the intercontinental ballistic missiles purchased from China many years ago provide the foundation for a Saudi strategic force. Given the scale of these dangers, American post-war planning for Saudi Arabia should neutralize the blowback scenario. If or when the U.S. forces depart, they should be sure to take all their baggage with them. The advanced aircraft, missiles, electronics and other systems can be flown or shipped out (with compensation based on the residual value of these weapons, of course). Whatever cannot be moved, such as the bases, radar antennas, and ground facilities, must be destroyed.2003-02-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|