Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Ephraim Asculai - The "engagement" process, the diplomatic effort to achieve at least a short halt in Iran's nuclear progress, has been failing for more than a decade, and the increasing sanctions levied by the UN Security Council, the EU and the U.S. have done very little to assist the futile diplomatic process. Economic sanctions have a rather poor record of success. A different trend of stronger sanctions should hit Iranian pride and dignity. They should include ostracism from the world community and suspension from international fora and sports events. Such measures could get Iran's attention more than the slow-moving economic sanctions with their extensive waivers and persistent world trade in oil and commodities. A 2013 paper from The Iran Project, by 35 dignitaries, former U.S. officials and outside experts, says "a strengthened diplomatic track that includes the promise of sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable cooperation could help to end the standoff and produce a nuclear deal." Yet, given the urgency of the issue due to the rapid progress of the Iranian nuclear program, it is very unfortunate that these officials behave as if there were all the time in the world to restart the diplomatic process, reduce the pressure on Iran and put all the cards on the diplomatic front. The suggested combination of sanctions easements, the very mild and only hinted-at U.S. threat of military action, and the obvious military nature of Iran's nuclear ambitions is alarming. The author is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. 2013-04-29 00:00:00Full Article
The Failure of "Engagement" with Iran
(Jerusalem Post) Ephraim Asculai - The "engagement" process, the diplomatic effort to achieve at least a short halt in Iran's nuclear progress, has been failing for more than a decade, and the increasing sanctions levied by the UN Security Council, the EU and the U.S. have done very little to assist the futile diplomatic process. Economic sanctions have a rather poor record of success. A different trend of stronger sanctions should hit Iranian pride and dignity. They should include ostracism from the world community and suspension from international fora and sports events. Such measures could get Iran's attention more than the slow-moving economic sanctions with their extensive waivers and persistent world trade in oil and commodities. A 2013 paper from The Iran Project, by 35 dignitaries, former U.S. officials and outside experts, says "a strengthened diplomatic track that includes the promise of sanctions relief in exchange for verifiable cooperation could help to end the standoff and produce a nuclear deal." Yet, given the urgency of the issue due to the rapid progress of the Iranian nuclear program, it is very unfortunate that these officials behave as if there were all the time in the world to restart the diplomatic process, reduce the pressure on Iran and put all the cards on the diplomatic front. The suggested combination of sanctions easements, the very mild and only hinted-at U.S. threat of military action, and the obvious military nature of Iran's nuclear ambitions is alarming. The author is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. 2013-04-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|