Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Atlantic) Amitai Etzioni - Critics claim that, according to international law, force should be used only when terrorists pose an imminent threat. However, because terrorists do not abide by the rules of armed conflicts, which require that combatants identify themselves as such, and not merely reveal their status only when ready to strike, all those who can be reliably identified as terrorists are a legitimate target. Simply because al-Qaeda and its associates hide their status does not mean that they should be accorded better protection. Should we kill terrorists that cannot be captured and should drones be employed? I contend that once one agrees that kill we must, drones are the much-preferred tool of warfare. Unlike cruise missiles and bombs, unpiloted aviation systems allow for long and careful surveillance before a strike. By using drones, one can wait until the children are away from the area and take other measures necessary for minimizing collateral damage. The writer, a senior advisor to the Carter White House, is a professor of international relations at George Washington University.2013-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
What Drone Critics Get Wrong
(Atlantic) Amitai Etzioni - Critics claim that, according to international law, force should be used only when terrorists pose an imminent threat. However, because terrorists do not abide by the rules of armed conflicts, which require that combatants identify themselves as such, and not merely reveal their status only when ready to strike, all those who can be reliably identified as terrorists are a legitimate target. Simply because al-Qaeda and its associates hide their status does not mean that they should be accorded better protection. Should we kill terrorists that cannot be captured and should drones be employed? I contend that once one agrees that kill we must, drones are the much-preferred tool of warfare. Unlike cruise missiles and bombs, unpiloted aviation systems allow for long and careful surveillance before a strike. By using drones, one can wait until the children are away from the area and take other measures necessary for minimizing collateral damage. The writer, a senior advisor to the Carter White House, is a professor of international relations at George Washington University.2013-05-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|