Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Fordham International Law Journal) Brooke Goldstein and Benjamin Ryberg - The campaign to make politically incorrect any discourse about Islamist terrorism has an undeniable deterrent effect. This, in conjunction with the routine filing of frivolous lawsuits solely to intimidate and punish, has the very real tendency of chilling speech. On a practical level, lawfare against free speech is hampering the nation's ability to uncover and confront Islamist terrorism and its sources of financing, as enemies of the U.S. shield their activities from penetration by shouting "Islamophobia." Federal legislation barring the provision of "material support or resources," as it has been developed by case law, lacks efficacy if the very organizations funding terrorist groups are left to continue their illegal activities without scrutiny. Brooke Goldstein is founder and Director of The Lawfare Project, where Benjamin Ryberg is Director of Research. 2013-05-10 00:00:00Full Article
The Emerging Face of Lawfare: Legal Maneuvering Designed to Hinder the Exposure of Terrorism and Terrorist Financing
(Fordham International Law Journal) Brooke Goldstein and Benjamin Ryberg - The campaign to make politically incorrect any discourse about Islamist terrorism has an undeniable deterrent effect. This, in conjunction with the routine filing of frivolous lawsuits solely to intimidate and punish, has the very real tendency of chilling speech. On a practical level, lawfare against free speech is hampering the nation's ability to uncover and confront Islamist terrorism and its sources of financing, as enemies of the U.S. shield their activities from penetration by shouting "Islamophobia." Federal legislation barring the provision of "material support or resources," as it has been developed by case law, lacks efficacy if the very organizations funding terrorist groups are left to continue their illegal activities without scrutiny. Brooke Goldstein is founder and Director of The Lawfare Project, where Benjamin Ryberg is Director of Research. 2013-05-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|