Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) - Ze'ev Schiff Iran has between 18 months and two years to cross the point of no return and then a little while longer until it is manufacturing weapons at a reasonable rate. Iran's goal, therefore, is to create international foot-dragging on the issue, to gain time; to create the impression that there's room for negotiation and, at the same time, to accelerate the nuclear development. There are elements in the U.S., particularly in the State Department, who are sending a message of having given up the possibility of preventing the development. This is a poor strategic approach that will only increase the determination of the North Koreans and accelerate the proliferation of nuclear weapons. There is still time to move against the Iranian nuclear plans, whether through the Security Council or with other means. According to nuclear experts, it is also technically possible. Iran claims it wants to develop nuclear energy for civilian purposes. There's no economic logic to this, of course, since the country has enormous reserves of petroleum and gas. The Iranians appear to be nervous ahead of the Vienna meeting of the IAEA board of governors on June 16: It's clear to them that if suspicions about their activities deepen, this will strengthen those in Washington who are demanding the issue be brought to the Security Council.2003-06-11 00:00:00Full Article
Can Iran's Nuclear Program be Stopped?
(Ha'aretz) - Ze'ev Schiff Iran has between 18 months and two years to cross the point of no return and then a little while longer until it is manufacturing weapons at a reasonable rate. Iran's goal, therefore, is to create international foot-dragging on the issue, to gain time; to create the impression that there's room for negotiation and, at the same time, to accelerate the nuclear development. There are elements in the U.S., particularly in the State Department, who are sending a message of having given up the possibility of preventing the development. This is a poor strategic approach that will only increase the determination of the North Koreans and accelerate the proliferation of nuclear weapons. There is still time to move against the Iranian nuclear plans, whether through the Security Council or with other means. According to nuclear experts, it is also technically possible. Iran claims it wants to develop nuclear energy for civilian purposes. There's no economic logic to this, of course, since the country has enormous reserves of petroleum and gas. The Iranians appear to be nervous ahead of the Vienna meeting of the IAEA board of governors on June 16: It's clear to them that if suspicions about their activities deepen, this will strengthen those in Washington who are demanding the issue be brought to the Security Council.2003-06-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|