Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) - Efraim Inbar One panacea prescribed for calming the conflict with the Palestinians is an international trusteeship, which means transferring governmental responsibility in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza to a U.S.-led alliance and introducing American forces to keep the peace. Yet Washington's priorities prior to dealing with Palestinian terror apparently require completing their missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as focusing attention on Iran and North Korea, states with a nuclear potential and far-reaching consequences for international security. Historically, peacekeeping forces are put in place after an agreement between two sides, but in this case the proposed foreign forces are to come in place of a bilateral agreement. Bringing in American forces would put one of the pillars of Israeli national security - the strategic partnership with the U.S. - at risk. American losses in defending Israel would erode support for the Jewish state. 2003-06-27 00:00:00Full Article
A Trusteeship for Palestine?
(Jerusalem Post) - Efraim Inbar One panacea prescribed for calming the conflict with the Palestinians is an international trusteeship, which means transferring governmental responsibility in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza to a U.S.-led alliance and introducing American forces to keep the peace. Yet Washington's priorities prior to dealing with Palestinian terror apparently require completing their missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as focusing attention on Iran and North Korea, states with a nuclear potential and far-reaching consequences for international security. Historically, peacekeeping forces are put in place after an agreement between two sides, but in this case the proposed foreign forces are to come in place of a bilateral agreement. Bringing in American forces would put one of the pillars of Israeli national security - the strategic partnership with the U.S. - at risk. American losses in defending Israel would erode support for the Jewish state. 2003-06-27 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|